Archives
Archives
| From: | "Kevin F. Quinn" <kevquinn@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Portage phase hooks patch | ||
| Date: | Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:33:18 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20060725093010.543286af@c1358217.kevquinn.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Portage phase hooks patch by Mike Kelly |
||
| 1 | On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:31:58 -0400 |
| 2 | Mike Kelly <pioto@×××××.org> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > Well, the main benefit I get by not using an eclass hook is that I can |
| 5 | > properly clean up after myself if a build fails, and, I think, better |
| 6 | > handle the addition of users in the case where the build and install |
| 7 | > machines are different. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | If the main issue is cleaning up after an abort, perhaps it would be |
| 10 | useful to add a pkg_abort() phase to the package manager; then that can |
| 11 | be implemented in an eclass. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Kevin F. Quinn |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Portage phase hooks patch | Philipp Riegger <lists@××××××××××××.de> |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Portage phase hooks patch | Ryan Hill <dirtyepic.sk@×××××.com> |