| 1 |
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 23:53 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:48:41 -0500 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> | What the hell are you talking about? No tools have even been |
| 4 |
> | created yet. Nobody builds tools before the framework is in place. The |
| 5 |
> | ability to make use of RRDEPEND as I've pointed out by verify-rdepend |
| 6 |
> | and revdep-rebuild could be pretty much immediate. The ability to |
| 7 |
> | control what level of depends a user wants in his/her depgraph is up |
| 8 |
> | to the user. The way I envision it you could just as easliy do |
| 9 |
> | ROOT=/dev/shm/minimal emerge -KO --deps="RDEPEND:DEPEND:PDEPEND" |
| 10 |
> | pkgfoo To yield the same results as portage by default. In general |
| 11 |
> | I'd suggest that you not attempt to make use of features that don't |
| 12 |
> | suit your needs. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Why introduce a feature which is crippled? It would be almost as easy to |
| 15 |
> allow ebuilds to mess with their 'real' runtime dependency value as |
| 16 |
> appropriate rather than forcing an incorrect auto-generated list onto |
| 17 |
> everyone. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Please go back to trolling on dev We are trying to get work done here |
| 20 |
and solve real problems. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 25 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives