Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Manifest2 reloaded
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:37:45
Message-Id: 4418A6D5.1010903@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Manifest2 reloaded by Marius Mauch
1 Marius Mauch schrieb:
2 > The first should be delayed until there is some consensus how the gpg
3 > stuff should work in the future, the others I don't see the use for.
4 > Also I only checked portage.py for changes, so emerge/repoman/... might
5 > still have to be fixed.
6 > Last but not least: I did some basic testing with this and the
7 > important stuff seems to work, but I'm quite sure the code still has a
8 > lot of bugs/issues, and this being a core functionality it needs a
9 > *lot* of testing, so I'd really appreciate if you could all give it a
10 > spin (but do not commit anything to the tree without manually checking
11 > it first).
12
13 Does the lack of feedback (only got a reaction from Brian so far) mean
14 that noone tried it or that it doesn't have any issues?
15
16 Marius
17 --
18 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Manifest2 reloaded Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>