| 1 |
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:12:31 +0200 |
| 2 |
Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Well, the primary goal is to make all sets behave in a consistent way. |
| 5 |
> And some sets have the explicit purpose to rebuild stuff, so making |
| 6 |
> sets "selective" by default also has issues. |
| 7 |
> The proposed change would also make sets behave in the same way as |
| 8 |
> packages which is IMO another benefit. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
This actually has more consequences: "selective" is a global setting, |
| 11 |
you can't enable it just for some arguments. Therefore if packages and |
| 12 |
sets are treated differently it requires that they can't be mixed on |
| 13 |
the commandline (and if we'd make the setting configurable for each set |
| 14 |
then only one set can be used at any time). And right now I can't think |
| 15 |
of another reason why that restriction would be necessary. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Marius |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 23 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives