| 1 |
On Monday 18 July 2005 14:05, Anthony Gorecki wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday, July 17, 2005 9:06 pm, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > The |
| 4 |
> > reason is that I'd like a second pair of eyes to look |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Personally, I prefer the kernel's method of handling this (which is |
| 7 |
> also what I use for my own development). A highly detailed, |
| 8 |
> automated changelog with non-binary file differentials is quite |
| 9 |
> useful for people that want to monitor the code. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I have no idea what you are saying here. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> > From now on, I'll be posting everything that I am thinking of |
| 14 |
> > pushing into stable (portage-2.0) and would like it if people |
| 15 |
> > could look over the patches and respond with a yay or nay. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> In the future, it might be helpful to post those patches in-line, |
| 18 |
> along with the message. That way no-one needs to open a separate |
| 19 |
> program to view the changes. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I thought about that, but line-wrapping and python's severe reliance |
| 22 |
on whitespace kind of makes that difficult. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Jason Stubbs |
Archives