| 1 |
On Sunday, July 17, 2005 9:06 pm, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> The |
| 3 |
> reason is that I'd like a second pair of eyes to look |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Personally, I prefer the kernel's method of handling this (which is also what |
| 6 |
I use for my own development). A highly detailed, automated changelog with |
| 7 |
non-binary file differentials is quite useful for people that want to monitor |
| 8 |
the code. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> From now on, I'll be posting everything that I am thinking of pushing |
| 12 |
> into stable (portage-2.0) and would like it if people could look over |
| 13 |
> the patches and respond with a yay or nay. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
In the future, it might be helpful to post those patches in-line, along with |
| 16 |
the message. That way no-one needs to open a separate program to view the |
| 17 |
changes. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Anthony Gorecki |
| 22 |
Ectro-Linux Foundation |
Archives