| 1 |
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 07:30:41PM +0900, Chris White wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Hi all, |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Attached to this email is a document that describes proposed changes, |
| 8 |
> why I propose the changes, and what other areas of portage need to be |
| 9 |
> changed so they changes don't break other things. Right now I'm poking |
| 10 |
> the waters to see how much of the proposal, if any, that the developers |
| 11 |
> will go for. This will prevent me from writing lots of code, only to |
| 12 |
> find out that "such and such won't work" ;). Comments welcome. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Snip... |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
xpak implementation sucks, has needed a rewrite for a while- proper |
| 17 |
handling of it would be test case of before/after (yes that's dumping |
| 18 |
the tests on you also)... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Personally... I'd just do the bugger, and post that patch rather then |
| 21 |
asking if it should be done (if you're asking, it's an indication it's |
| 22 |
needed ;) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
My 2 cents... |
| 25 |
~harring |
Archives