| 1 |
i'm curious how explicit package keywords have to be. for instance, if |
| 2 |
package A depends on package B and package B has "-ppc", should package |
| 3 |
A also get "-ppc" (perhaps with a comment as to what dependency is |
| 4 |
causing it to be being -ppc'ed)? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
i realize that there's no real harm here, since dependencies will take |
| 7 |
care of not letting A be installed. i'm just curious if we're trying to |
| 8 |
get rid of all instances of ppc not being addressed in KEYWORDS (ie: |
| 9 |
making sure that either "ppc" or "-ppc" is in the KEYWORDS of all |
| 10 |
ebuilds). |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
if we're being explicit, the following should get -ppc since they depend |
| 13 |
on sys-apps/apmd, (which is -ppc): |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
gnome-extra/battstat |
| 16 |
x11-misc/bbapm |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
nall. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
nall <nall@××××××××××××××××.net> |
Archives