| 1 |
On 01/31/2017 01:36 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> W dniu 31.01.2017, wto o godzinie 22∶06 +0100, użytkownik Andreas K. |
| 3 |
> Huettel napisał: |
| 4 |
>> Dear all, |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> in two weeks from now the council will meet again, so now it's time |
| 7 |
>> to raise |
| 8 |
>> and prepare items that the council should put on the agenda to |
| 9 |
>> discuss or vote |
| 10 |
>> on. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> Please reply to this message with agenda items. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> If you have already brought up agenda items on the mailing lists |
| 15 |
>> since the |
| 16 |
>> last meeting, please also repeat them in a reply here, including |
| 17 |
>> links to the |
| 18 |
>> original discussion threads. |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> The agenda will be sent out on Monday 2017-02-06. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I would like the Council to revisit GLEP 27 [1]. The GLEP is |
| 23 |
> in accepted state since mid-2004. Considering that its text is vague, |
| 24 |
> the idea does not solve many real-life problems and no attempt at |
| 25 |
> implementation was successful, I think it'd be reasonable to mark it |
| 26 |
> 'deferred' or 'rejected' instead. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> [1]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:27 |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
+1 |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Perhaps we could spur a discussion (unless there's a conclusion I |
| 33 |
haven't found yet?) on this so maintainers know how to correctly deal |
| 34 |
with UID/GID in ebuilds and openrc scripts. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer |
| 38 |
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net |
| 39 |
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 |
Archives