| 1 |
W dniu 31.01.2017, wto o godzinie 22∶06 +0100, użytkownik Andreas K. |
| 2 |
Huettel napisał: |
| 3 |
> Dear all, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> in two weeks from now the council will meet again, so now it's time |
| 6 |
> to raise |
| 7 |
> and prepare items that the council should put on the agenda to |
| 8 |
> discuss or vote |
| 9 |
> on. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Please reply to this message with agenda items. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> If you have already brought up agenda items on the mailing lists |
| 14 |
> since the |
| 15 |
> last meeting, please also repeat them in a reply here, including |
| 16 |
> links to the |
| 17 |
> original discussion threads. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> The agenda will be sent out on Monday 2017-02-06. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I would like the Council to revisit GLEP 27 [1]. The GLEP is |
| 22 |
in accepted state since mid-2004. Considering that its text is vague, |
| 23 |
the idea does not solve many real-life problems and no attempt at |
| 24 |
implementation was successful, I think it'd be reasonable to mark it |
| 25 |
'deferred' or 'rejected' instead. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
[1]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:27 |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Best regards, |
| 31 |
Michał Górny |
Archives