1 |
I disagree with this part. |
2 |
|
3 |
People should not be required in my opinion to be staff in order to have |
4 |
membership in the foundation. |
5 |
|
6 |
There may be people who don't know how to be staff, or can't be arsed to |
7 |
learn, or whatever the case may be have problems being staff, but who still |
8 |
love gentoo and help however they can. |
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@g.o> |
13 |
wrote: |
14 |
|
15 |
> Some definitions |
16 |
> |
17 |
> - All devs are staff |
18 |
> |
19 |
> - All staff are voting foundation members |
20 |
> |
21 |
> - You can be staff without being a dev (forum, bugs, irc) |
22 |
> |
23 |
> - Foundation membership is automatically revoked if you miss two |
24 |
> Foundation elections (not sure if this needs to change) |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Proposal |
29 |
> |
30 |
> - All prospective staff must apply to be Foundation members, allowing |
31 |
> for final approval by the trustees as is the current policy. Anyone not |
32 |
> accepted will not be given staff membership. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> - Any Foundation membership granted as a result of a staff position is |
35 |
> lost when the position as staff is concluded. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> - Any staff that is kicked or leaves during a ComRel incident may |
38 |
> appeal their incident with the appropriate body. They will either |
39 |
> retain or lose both staff and foundation membership simultaneously. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> |
42 |
> |
43 |
> Knock on effects |
44 |
> |
45 |
> - May need to modify staff quiz. Developers already take this so will |
46 |
> automatically satisfy this requirement. |
47 |
> |
48 |
> Positive CoC acknowledgement should be included in the staff quiz |
49 |
> |
50 |
> - By equating staff and Foundation membership we may have to change the |
51 |
> retirement criteria for staff. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> - Staff will have to vote in Foundation elections. |
54 |
> |
55 |
> - Staffers who are not devs do not belong to a project |
56 |
> |
57 |
> - projects could be made |
58 |
> |
59 |
> |
60 |
> Questions |
61 |
> |
62 |
> - Do staff get gentoo.org email addresses? |
63 |
> |
64 |
> - I do not think it’s necessary |
65 |
> (limits our liability (email addresses could be considered as loosing |
66 |
> property rights as mentioned elsewhere in one of these threads...), maybe) |
67 |
> |
68 |
> -- |
69 |
> -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |
70 |
> |
71 |
> |