Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] GLEP 63 - was Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11 | ||
| Date: | Wed, 05 Mar 2014 12:49:14 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_krR5cqm-9EEZuWXucP6BG2JJwoVqXaFtKCv3Cpp4gVUg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] GLEP 63 - was Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11 by "Robin H. Johnson" |
||
| 1 | On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > The role of the GLEP is to lock down the requirements, NOT the |
| 3 | > interface, or exact how-to instructions. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | If so, then I suggest we strip out everything but the requirements. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I'm fine with approving the direction, but I would not want to make |
| 8 | the GLEP effective until the instructions are available somewhere. I |
| 9 | guess we can use the "Accepted" vs "Final" statues to distinguish |
| 10 | this. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Rich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] GLEP 63 - was Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11 | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> |