1 |
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:44 PM, Daniel Robbins <drobbins@××××××.org> wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Robbins <drobbins@××××××.org> |
5 |
>> wrote: |
6 |
>> > |
7 |
>> > Sure, the Trustees have no authority over these volunteers -- as long as |
8 |
>> > they are not operating under the Gentoo name, Gentoo infrastructure, |
9 |
>> > Gentoo |
10 |
>> > repos, not using the Gentoo logo, Gentoo domains, etc. They are totally |
11 |
>> > free |
12 |
>> > to leave the project which is run by the Trustees, and then the trustees |
13 |
>> > have no authority over them. But as long as they are on a project called |
14 |
>> > "Gentoo Linux", the trustees have the authority to remove assholes from |
15 |
>> > the |
16 |
>> > project if they so desire. |
17 |
>> > |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> I'm sorry, was this supposed to represent the pro-openness side of the |
20 |
>> debate? |
21 |
> |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I have no agenda here other than to enlighten those who don't really |
24 |
> understand the concept of Trustees. I am not part of any debate regarding |
25 |
> mailing lists, etc. |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
Honestly, I think this is largely moot in practice because when it |
29 |
comes to passing actual resolutions I haven't really seen either the |
30 |
Council or Trustees going into open conflict, and I think this is |
31 |
unlikely. Sure, there is the strong opinion here or there, but most |
32 |
involved are fairly reasonable when they put their voting hats on. |
33 |
|
34 |
In any case, it is a situation I'd love to see resolved in the |
35 |
long-term precisely because of the possibility of the sorts of |
36 |
conflict you are bringing up here. A court would almost certainly see |
37 |
it the way you're arguing, but with an all-volunteer effort dealing |
38 |
with FOSS there are a lot of practical limits on what a court can do. |
39 |
In the US at least justice costs money. And a court isn't really |
40 |
going to do much more than bless trademark takedowns of websites |
41 |
should those even be sought, since the most important assets the |
42 |
Foundation owns (copyrights) are already open to a large degree with |
43 |
our FOSS licensing. |
44 |
|
45 |
IMO we really should embrace this as much as possible and take |
46 |
advantage of this, by trying to minimize the stuff we do in-house |
47 |
under the "Gentoo" umbrella and thus minimize our expenses and the |
48 |
legal compliance issues that go along with them. |
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
Rich |