1 |
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Robbins <drobbins@××××××.org> |
4 |
> wrote: |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Sure, the Trustees have no authority over these volunteers -- as long as |
7 |
> > they are not operating under the Gentoo name, Gentoo infrastructure, |
8 |
> Gentoo |
9 |
> > repos, not using the Gentoo logo, Gentoo domains, etc. They are totally |
10 |
> free |
11 |
> > to leave the project which is run by the Trustees, and then the trustees |
12 |
> > have no authority over them. But as long as they are on a project called |
13 |
> > "Gentoo Linux", the trustees have the authority to remove assholes from |
14 |
> the |
15 |
> > project if they so desire. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I'm sorry, was this supposed to represent the pro-openness side of the |
19 |
> debate? |
20 |
> |
21 |
|
22 |
I have no agenda here other than to enlighten those who don't really |
23 |
understand the concept of Trustees. I am not part of any debate regarding |
24 |
mailing lists, etc. |
25 |
|
26 |
-Daniel |