| 1 |
On 01/06/2017 10:43 AM, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
> This is a loss of influence compared to the current system but could |
| 3 |
> provide some incentive for developers to retain nominal involvement |
| 4 |
> outside of being a simple committer. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I think that would be very beneficial (to require foundation membership |
| 7 |
without legal reasons to abstain). It encourages responsibility and |
| 8 |
focusing on decision-making inside context instead of outside it. One of |
| 9 |
the reasons for this discussion is to unify Gentoo, so requiring dual |
| 10 |
membership (or rather, making them one and the same) goes a long way to |
| 11 |
furthering that goal. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer |
| 15 |
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net |
| 16 |
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 |
Archives