Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: gentoo-project <gentoo-project@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-10-14
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:09:54
Message-Id: CAAr7Pr-S0wHgKRq0QWvHvKFkgAEkvdi86v0GgfwBWr+vP+edRw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-10-14 by Andrew Savchenko
1 On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 5:24 PM Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> wrote:
2
3 > On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 19:35:13 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
4 > > >>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, Alec Warner wrote:
5 > >
6 > > > My reading of ulm's proposal is that it is allowed.
7 > >
8 > > > Ebuilds "shall" use the simple attribution, not that they "must" use
9 > it.
10 > >
11 > > > To me that implies the simple attribution should be the default, but
12 > the
13 > > > complex attribution is acceptable in the ::gentoo repo.
14 > >
15 > > > Maybe I'm misunderstanding the proposal?
16 > >
17 > > No, you've understood it exactly how it was meant.
18 >
19 > Then please write this explicitly in the proposed change. Right now
20 > it is only "shall" vs "must" difference which may confuse people
21 > and create misunderstanding in future.
22 >
23
24 If we update the wording, are you happy with the proposal now that we have
25 a shared understanding of its intent?
26
27 -A
28
29
30 >
31 > Best regards,
32 > Andrew Savchenko
33 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-10-14 Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o>