1 |
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 20:09:39 -0400 Alec Warner wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 5:24 PM Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 19:35:13 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
5 |
> > > >>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, Alec Warner wrote: |
6 |
> > > |
7 |
> > > > My reading of ulm's proposal is that it is allowed. |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > > > Ebuilds "shall" use the simple attribution, not that they "must" use |
10 |
> > it. |
11 |
> > > |
12 |
> > > > To me that implies the simple attribution should be the default, but |
13 |
> > the |
14 |
> > > > complex attribution is acceptable in the ::gentoo repo. |
15 |
> > > |
16 |
> > > > Maybe I'm misunderstanding the proposal? |
17 |
> > > |
18 |
> > > No, you've understood it exactly how it was meant. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > Then please write this explicitly in the proposed change. Right now |
21 |
> > it is only "shall" vs "must" difference which may confuse people |
22 |
> > and create misunderstanding in future. |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> |
25 |
> If we update the wording, are you happy with the proposal now that we have |
26 |
> a shared understanding of its intent? |
27 |
|
28 |
Yes, I'll be happy as long as alternate form (explicit authors list |
29 |
with optional "and others") will be allowed with clear wording. |
30 |
|
31 |
Best regards, |
32 |
Andrew Savchenko |