| 1 |
On 11/6/13 10:43 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 2 |
>> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 09:18:43AM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 3 |
>>> 8. Revival of archives.gentoo.org |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> There isn't any reference for this one, who's spear-heading it; as infra |
| 6 |
>> I'd like to know. We do have the raw emails for the archive, what's |
| 7 |
>> broken is strictly the web interface. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I am, and the only available reference is the announcement itself, see the |
| 10 |
> paragraph at the top about missing references :). |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> My only intention for this topic so far is to ask my council colleagues for |
| 13 |
> their opinion on a general statement like "archives.gentoo.org functionality |
| 14 |
> was useful, and it would be nice to have our own online, definitive archive of |
| 15 |
> the more important mailing lists back working again at some point in the |
| 16 |
> future". |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Curious: does anyone have any doubts about usefulness of archives.g.o? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Then, do you know what actually broke? It's really surprising to me |
| 21 |
since it seems that hardly anything changes there. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Paweł |
Archives