Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Proposed Revisions to QA GLEP-48
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:26:04
Message-Id: 5283FC79.6070907@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Proposed Revisions to QA GLEP-48 by Rich Freeman
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 11/13/2013 07:02 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
5 > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:48 PM, William Hubbs
6 > <williamh@g.o> wrote:
7 >>
8 >> If there is a technical disagreement between a developer and QA
9 >> and the QA lead is confirmed by the council, that puts the
10 >> council in a very awquard position for an appeal. The council
11 >> would either have to back the QA lead, who they have confirmed,
12 >> or back the developer who is appealing. If the council backs the
13 >> QA lead, the appeals process is pointless, but if they back the
14 >> developer, it makes their confirmation of the qa lead
15 >> questionable.
16 >
17 > I don't buy this line of argument at all. In virtually every
18 > organization I'm aware of (corporations, non-profits, governments,
19 > courts, etc) the people at the top are elected, and anybody below
20 > them derives their authority from those at the top.
21
22 And that is a misconception. All authority should be derived from
23 popular vote.
24
25 As soon as one elected authority appoints another authority, the
26 system is screwed and the division of powers rotten, because the
27 elected authority will likely not appoint another authority that could
28 make their lives more difficult (and that is what happens in virtually
29 every organization I'm aware of including governments, courts...).
30
31 That's the same with comrel. They are loosely backed up by the
32 council, but there is no proper constitution process.
33
34 However, that process is not strictly required to fix structural
35 problems... unless we turned bureaucratic. In that case I want to vote
36 on the QA lead.
37 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
38 Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
39 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
40
41 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSg/x5AAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzSc8H/14jixOnE+rM5ZXVcuJYNNcn
42 jvA1wOFjT3Wo+VqmIUIU4vq+z84DatVTeG69sPltz08cz6Z6Yom1UeK0kDzplkRi
43 OAOuyWn7qw3hNvvt5y7AtQ4y8u8g8PChDNjgOU1IlM0GlrxWVLQpUhloG3t/3hUr
44 lGyVqHq2eBD1KXyWoKtfp89xNiqIGl4E18I9/ssbWrSg3pWpD1UgNa+S4LCYrOlh
45 TKrc7e1XxhzpC++hFp1jXFwFcrBWxN5tvCWuyYSiJigVJJ7UdAqfNHWg8buS5RAi
46 ajgJPDaHUS/vLbrH9dffZ6e9xxI6fW6ng34kPTyv045ipHTt6LTAZc0+YIP004s=
47 =zt7o
48 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Proposed Revisions to QA GLEP-48 Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>