| 1 |
On Sunday 12 April 2015 12:04:08 hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 04/12/2015 12:02 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sunday 12 April 2015 11:59:09 hasufell wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On 04/11/2015 01:54 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>> 1. What does proxy-maintainers lack in comparison to sunrise |
| 6 |
> >>> exclusively. The immediate question is whether sunrise should be |
| 7 |
> >>> migrated to proxy-maintainers, so this specific comparison is |
| 8 |
> >>> important. |
| 9 |
> >> |
| 10 |
> >> proxy-maintainers lack: |
| 11 |
> >> 1. a repository with a usable VCS |
| 12 |
> >> 2. an actual review workflow... @proxy-maintainers are just some sort of |
| 13 |
> >> backup committers. it's not a hub for contributors to gather, discuss, |
| 14 |
> >> get reviews and improve skills |
| 15 |
> >> 3. means to ensure the tree doesn't break |
| 16 |
> >> 4. actively look for and educate potential developers, even before the |
| 17 |
> >> recruitment process |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > Oh my. |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > Can you please stop being such a drama queen and accept reality every now |
| 22 |
> > and then? |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> I am unable to see how that contributes anything to the discussion. |
| 25 |
> Could you please stay on the factual level? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
So. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
(1) is a completely subjective opinion |
| 30 |
(2) is kinda ... like ... your opinion, if you were actually involved with |
| 31 |
proxy-maint you'd know better |
| 32 |
(3) uhm what? That is just absurd speculation without a factual base in our |
| 33 |
common shared reality |
| 34 |
(4) That's, like, your opinion, maaan. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
If you actually spent time near proxy-maint, or in #gentoo-dev-help, or |
| 37 |
basically anywhere where you'd interact with people, you'd not have these |
| 38 |
absurd fantasies about stuff. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
So I suggest you can try to do some proper fact finding first :) |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
... and then we could even try having a constructive discussion. That'd be, |
| 43 |
like, AAAWESOOME. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> >> So it should, if at all, be the other way around: dissolve |
| 47 |
> >> proxy-maintainers, fix the sunrise workflow and make it the contribution |
| 48 |
> >> hub again it once was. But I'm not actually advocating for that. I think |
| 49 |
> >> the sunrise concept doesn't work anymore. |
| 50 |
> > |
| 51 |
> > proxy-maint is the least broken process we have. Unless you have |
| 52 |
> > constructive criticism I don't see why you waste time whining about |
| 53 |
> > everything. |
| 54 |
> You have obviously not read the whole email. I did offer an alternative |
| 55 |
> solution. Please read the whole text. |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
Mhhh yes. No. Thanks for playing. |
| 58 |
(Are you trying to get me drunk? Because that's how you get me drunk ...) |
Archives