1 |
Dnia 3 października 2015 11:40:22 CEST, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> napisał(a): |
2 |
>>>>>> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Michał Górny wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>> Am Wednesday 30 September 2015, 22:21:27 schrieb Andreas K. Huettel: |
5 |
>>> > a) Remove the word "herd" from docs and specifications. |
6 |
>>> > |
7 |
>>> > b) Package is "in herd" -> package is "maintained by project" |
8 |
>>> > |
9 |
>>> > c) In metadata.xml, replace <herd>x<herd> -> <project>y<project> |
10 |
>>> > This needs (as Ulrich has already pointed out) a short-name y for |
11 |
>>> > each project, to be defined on its wiki page. E.g., "Gentoo KDE |
12 |
>>> > project" has shortname kde. |
13 |
> |
14 |
>> What's the gain? Does it justify breaking every tool dealing with |
15 |
>> metadata.xml out there? |
16 |
> |
17 |
>At some point, backwards compatibility becomes a burden. If we are |
18 |
>going to abandon herds then it is only consequent to retire the |
19 |
>corresponding metadata tag. And yes, some tools will have to be |
20 |
>adjusted. You can't make an omelette without breaking eggs. |
21 |
|
22 |
And why are we going to do that? I feel like you hijacked my agenda item with your own problem. |
23 |
|
24 |
> |
25 |
>> Are you going to fix package managers, gentoolkit, gentoopm, |
26 |
>> packages.gentoo.org (in both versions), willikins, Funtoo |
27 |
>> scripts...? Or is this going to be another smart move which forces |
28 |
>> others to do extra work just because someone didn't like the name? |
29 |
> |
30 |
>Is there anything in this list that requires more than a trivial fix? |
31 |
|
32 |
Well, looking at where this is heading, yes. Most likely most of them will be required to implement some kind of MediaWiki RPC... |
33 |
|
34 |
> |
35 |
>Ulrich |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Best regards, |
39 |
Michał Górny |