Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Questions for Gentoo Council nominees: Power balance
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 07:31:54
Message-Id: e014708d-25d1-2d77-5dc4-2bcc6c219562@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] Questions for Gentoo Council nominees: Power balance by Andrew Savchenko
1 On 15.06.2019 13:00, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
2
3 [...]
4
5 > 1. The same person can now be in the Gentoo Council and the Trustees
6 > board.
7 > 2. QA can now bypass Comrel on bans.
8 >
9 > What is your opinion on this?
10 > Should this balance be left as is?
11 > If it should be tuned, then how?
12 >
13
14 1. Personally I would not vote for the same person being council and
15 trustees member at the same time.
16
17 2. QA has already had the right of bypassing ComRel on bans once QA lead
18 requested it from infra directly.
19
20 Now we have clear policy about it which helps people avoiding confusion,
21 no implicit actions anymore therefore this is less questionable now than
22 it was before.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature