| 1 |
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:42:20 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi all! |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Last year we had a good initiative: it addition to (or even instead |
| 5 |
> of) manifests nominees were asked questions by voters. So let's |
| 6 |
> continue this year. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I propose to have one question per thread spawned by this e-mail to |
| 9 |
> keep discussion focused. If you have multiple questions, please |
| 10 |
> start multiple threads. If your question was already asked, please |
| 11 |
> join a thread. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I'll ask my questions in subsequent e-mails. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Gentoo power balance was carefully crafted over the years. However |
| 16 |
during last year that balance was disrupted: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
1. The same person can now be in the Gentoo Council and the Trustees |
| 19 |
board. |
| 20 |
2. QA can now bypass Comrel on bans. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
What is your opinion on this? |
| 23 |
Should this balance be left as is? |
| 24 |
If it should be tuned, then how? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I'm worried about that some people or teams may gain too much power |
| 27 |
and misuse it. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
One possible solution will be to limit number of teams or roles a |
| 30 |
single person may participate, but this may result in some teams |
| 31 |
outnumbered since many have lack of manpower problem. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
A better solution may be "single person => single vote" rule, so |
| 34 |
everyone is free to participate where and how they want, but in a |
| 35 |
case when multiple teams are involved in processing an issue a |
| 36 |
single person may vote only once and it is up to them to choose |
| 37 |
using what role. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Best regards, |
| 40 |
Andrew Savchenko |
Archives