| 1 |
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 01:00:33PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
| 2 |
> Gentoo power balance was carefully crafted over the years. However |
| 3 |
> during last year that balance was disrupted: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> 1. The same person can now be in the Gentoo Council and the Trustees |
| 6 |
> board. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I personally wouldn't vote for that, but you are right, they can. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> 2. QA can now bypass Comrel on bans. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I was on the council when this first came up. I had several discussions |
| 13 |
with the comrel lead at the time and comrel did not want to be involved |
| 14 |
in the process of qa temporarily suspending commit privileges. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> What is your opinion on this? |
| 17 |
> Should this balance be left as is? |
| 18 |
> If it should be tuned, then how? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I'm worried about that some people or teams may gain too much power |
| 21 |
> and misuse it. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I'm not as concerned about the trustees/council as I am about other |
| 24 |
teams. |
| 25 |
For example, it is possible right now for someone to serve on qa, |
| 26 |
comrel and the council at the same time. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I have voiced my concerns about this in the past, but there are a |
| 29 |
number of people in the distro who don't see this as a problem, so |
| 30 |
nothing happened. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
I do plan to bring up a glep 39 change again for this issue and we'll |
| 33 |
see what happens. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
William |
Archives