| 1 |
You got it. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
My main point is that there should be a way for foundation |
| 4 |
members/devs/whatever to prove a) they're interested enough to show good |
| 5 |
attendance at voting, but b) without having to get politically inclined if |
| 6 |
they can't be arsed to do anything but codemonkey type stuff or what have |
| 7 |
you. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:34 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. <wlt-ml@××××××.com> |
| 10 |
wrote: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> On Friday, October 14, 2016 12:23:04 PM EDT Raymond Jennings wrote: |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > My point is that if they show up to vote and their vote is "abstain", it |
| 15 |
> > should count as if they voted for someone. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Oh yes, to remain active sure. Though could just not require them to vote, |
| 18 |
> so |
| 19 |
> a no vote is the same as abstain. But that might be more confusing. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Your basically proposing an additional option be added to any ballot of |
| 22 |
> "Abstain" |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Good point, as that could apply to anyone. I do not think that has been |
| 25 |
> mentioned thus far. One is still voting, just not casting it any direction, |
| 26 |
> going neutral. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> That would really apply to "supporters" to retain their status, voting |
| 29 |
> annually, but not taking a position either way on their vote. Also to dev/ |
| 30 |
> staff/etc if they carry forward the auto membership expiration after 3yrs |
| 31 |
> inactivity, 2 non vote, 3rd grace period. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> -- |
| 34 |
> William L. Thomson Jr. |
| 35 |
> |
Archives