| 1 |
On Friday, October 14, 2016 12:36:23 PM EDT Raymond Jennings wrote: |
| 2 |
> You got it. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> My main point is that there should be a way for foundation |
| 5 |
> members/devs/whatever to prove a) they're interested enough to show good |
| 6 |
> attendance at voting, but b) without having to get politically inclined if |
| 7 |
> they can't be arsed to do anything but codemonkey type stuff or what have |
| 8 |
> you. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Yes, could go even further. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Developers/staff/etc automatically have an "Abstain" vote while they are |
| 14 |
active in Gentoo. They can literally avoid the foundation entirely but still |
| 15 |
be an active member. Not even required to "Abstain" as it is an auto vote. |
| 16 |
Though if they choose to vote, they can always change the default. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
That would not apply to "supporters". Just a convenient thing for those within |
| 19 |
Gentoo to not have to be bothered with Foundation voting, while retaining |
| 20 |
active membership. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Good points, I do not think they had been brought up! |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Anything that makes Developers/staff/etc life better in Gentoo I am all for! |
| 25 |
Less bureaucracy more automation! |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Archives