Archives
Archives
| From: | Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-04-09 | ||
| Date: | Sat, 06 Apr 2013 21:33:04 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130406154314.0d7dc7ef@caribou.gateway.2wire.net | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-04-09 by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 18:54:50 +0200 |
| 2 | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > I'd be a little more proactive and deprecate EAPIs 0 and 1 immediately |
| 5 | > (which would correspond to the 4 years mentioned above). When doing a |
| 6 | > version or revision bump, the ebuild should be updated to use a newer |
| 7 | > EAPI. There can be exceptions, e.g. for security bumps. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Toolchain packages are EAPI 0 and we aren't changing. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | gcc-porting |
| 14 | toolchain, wxwidgets by design, by neglect |
| 15 | @ gentoo.org for a fact or just for effect |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-04-09 | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-04-09 | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> |