Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 12:21:24
Message-Id: 20151010122111.GG1392@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11 by hasufell
1 On 10-10-2015 13:37:24 +0200, hasufell wrote:
2 > On 10/10/2015 01:35 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
3 > > Am Samstag, 10. Oktober 2015, 12:16:26 schrieb hasufell:
4 > >> On 10/10/2015 01:40 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
5 > >>> Am Freitag, 9. Oktober 2015, 14:15:15 schrieb hasufell:
6 > >>>> On 10/09/2015 01:56 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
7 > >>>>> Well let's think about this. If github went away, or we needed to part
8 > >>>>> ways with github, what we would we want to keep from their site?
9 > >>>>
10 > >>>> It is more likely that our infra servers go down or break than github.
11 > >>>> From a reliability standpoint, our infra servers clearly lose.
12 > >>>
13 > >>> I think you're missing the point here completely. Whatever.
14 > >
15 > >> Not at all, but you'd have to read my whole mail.
16 > >
17 > > The rest is even more irrelevant.
18 >
19 > Not at all, it discusses solutions to what I and blueness were
20 > discussing. If you cannot follow the discussion, why do you respond then?
21
22 Outsider's perspective: you and Anthony/Andreas are discussing completely
23 different topics.
24
25 My €0.02
26 Fabian
27
28
29 --
30 Fabian Groffen
31 Gentoo on a different level

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies