Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 12:23:42
Message-Id: 56190344.3000108@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11 by Fabian Groffen
1 On 10/10/2015 02:21 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
2 > On 10-10-2015 13:37:24 +0200, hasufell wrote:
3 >> On 10/10/2015 01:35 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
4 >>> Am Samstag, 10. Oktober 2015, 12:16:26 schrieb hasufell:
5 >>>> On 10/10/2015 01:40 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
6 >>>>> Am Freitag, 9. Oktober 2015, 14:15:15 schrieb hasufell:
7 >>>>>> On 10/09/2015 01:56 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
8 >>>>>>> Well let's think about this. If github went away, or we needed to part
9 >>>>>>> ways with github, what we would we want to keep from their site?
10 >>>>>>
11 >>>>>> It is more likely that our infra servers go down or break than github.
12 >>>>>> From a reliability standpoint, our infra servers clearly lose.
13 >>>>>
14 >>>>> I think you're missing the point here completely. Whatever.
15 >>>
16 >>>> Not at all, but you'd have to read my whole mail.
17 >>>
18 >>> The rest is even more irrelevant.
19 >>
20 >> Not at all, it discusses solutions to what I and blueness were
21 >> discussing. If you cannot follow the discussion, why do you respond then?
22 >
23 > Outsider's perspective: you and Anthony/Andreas are discussing completely
24 > different topics.
25 >
26
27 Thanks for the contribution. Can we get ontopic now instead of
28 nitpicking on a few single sentences that don't make sense if you didn't
29 read the whole discussion or didn't try to understand what the author
30 was getting at?
31
32 Thanks.

Replies