1 |
On 10/10/2015 02:21 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
2 |
> On 10-10-2015 13:37:24 +0200, hasufell wrote: |
3 |
>> On 10/10/2015 01:35 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
4 |
>>> Am Samstag, 10. Oktober 2015, 12:16:26 schrieb hasufell: |
5 |
>>>> On 10/10/2015 01:40 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
6 |
>>>>> Am Freitag, 9. Oktober 2015, 14:15:15 schrieb hasufell: |
7 |
>>>>>> On 10/09/2015 01:56 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
8 |
>>>>>>> Well let's think about this. If github went away, or we needed to part |
9 |
>>>>>>> ways with github, what we would we want to keep from their site? |
10 |
>>>>>> |
11 |
>>>>>> It is more likely that our infra servers go down or break than github. |
12 |
>>>>>> From a reliability standpoint, our infra servers clearly lose. |
13 |
>>>>> |
14 |
>>>>> I think you're missing the point here completely. Whatever. |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>>> Not at all, but you'd have to read my whole mail. |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>>> The rest is even more irrelevant. |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> Not at all, it discusses solutions to what I and blueness were |
21 |
>> discussing. If you cannot follow the discussion, why do you respond then? |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Outsider's perspective: you and Anthony/Andreas are discussing completely |
24 |
> different topics. |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
Thanks for the contribution. Can we get ontopic now instead of |
28 |
nitpicking on a few single sentences that don't make sense if you didn't |
29 |
read the whole discussion or didn't try to understand what the author |
30 |
was getting at? |
31 |
|
32 |
Thanks. |