Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11

[Dale]

hasufell wrote:
> On 10/10/2015 02:21 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>> On 10-10-2015 13:37:24 +0200, hasufell wrote:
>>> On 10/10/2015 01:35 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>>>> Am Samstag, 10. Oktober 2015, 12:16:26 schrieb hasufell:
>>>>> On 10/10/2015 01:40 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>>>>>> Am Freitag, 9. Oktober 2015, 14:15:15 schrieb hasufell:
>>>>>>> On 10/09/2015 01:56 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>>>>>>>> Well let's think about this.  If github went away, or we needed to part
>>>>>>>> ways with github, what we would we want to keep from their site?
>>>>>>> It is more likely that our infra servers go down or break than github.
>>>>>>> From a reliability standpoint, our infra servers clearly lose.
>>>>>> I think you're missing the point here completely. Whatever.
>>>>> Not at all, but you'd have to read my whole mail.
>>>> The rest is even more irrelevant.
>>> Not at all, it discusses solutions to what I and blueness were
>>> discussing. If you cannot follow the discussion, why do you respond then?
>> Outsider's perspective: you and Anthony/Andreas are discussing completely
>> different topics.
>>
> Thanks for the contribution. Can we get ontopic now instead of
> nitpicking on a few single sentences that don't make sense if you didn't
> read the whole discussion or didn't try to understand what the author
> was getting at?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>


I been following this too.  I think it is you who doesn't get it this
time.  May want to rethink this.  I'm not a developer and I don't even
claim to know all the details of the changes being made but even I can
follow what Andreas is saying.  He's making a point and either you can't
see it or just don't want to see it. 

Dale

:-)  :-)