1 |
Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
2 |
> Well... Let's put it like this. Sometime a while ago an oldtimer dev attacked a newbie dev on IRC, |
3 |
basically just because the newbie did his job properly, and this would |
4 |
have resulted in additional work for the oldtimer. I took the liberty of |
5 |
telling the old guy to stfu and not interfere. Immediately, several |
6 |
others, who had not followed the issue at all, started directing |
7 |
comments at me, telling me I was wrong. To my immense amusement, they |
8 |
then gave emphasized statements how things should be done, and that was |
9 |
exactly how the *newbie* did it! Now, I dont care that much anymore. |
10 |
However, I would suggest... If we do update our code of conduct we |
11 |
should make one thing very clear in the code of conduct or devrel |
12 |
guidelines or whatever: Independent of how many thousands of commits on |
13 |
g-x86 you did or do, Noone in gentoo is irreplaceable enough to justify |
14 |
gross misbehaviour. |
15 |
|
16 |
Since I moderate a website I'll add this. When I volunteered to be a |
17 |
moderator on the other site, I explained that for me to put my time and |
18 |
effort in, the same rules apply to EVERYONE. The same punishment |
19 |
applies to EVERYONE who breaks the rules. No preferential treatment for |
20 |
anyone. We talked for about 2 hours over the phone on this subject. |
21 |
After my explanation, and them seeing the logic to it, I was accepted as |
22 |
a moderator. |
23 |
|
24 |
Not to long ago, a important member violated a rule, rather large one at |
25 |
that, and I took action. At first, the owner was not happy then I |
26 |
reminded him of the phone conversation. Me moderating is a volunteer |
27 |
position and I'm not paid for it. If there is going to be double |
28 |
standards, find someone else. Double standards only lead to problems. |
29 |
Yes, the user was a VIP but the rules apply to the people who own the |
30 |
site too. They wouldn't post what that user did. They know better. |
31 |
After the owner settled down a bit and I posted the rule I applied, then |
32 |
he apologized for his reaction. I have not been questioned for |
33 |
enforcing a rule since. |
34 |
|
35 |
My point is, I been using Gentoo for about 10 years, 2003. I'm dalek on |
36 |
the forums. Yea, I was here when -dev was a sewer of a place and I |
37 |
wouldn't subscribe much less post anything. As it is now, -dev is a |
38 |
MUCH better place to be even tho I rarely post anything. If you are |
39 |
going to set up rules and have them enforced, shall I recommend they |
40 |
apply to everyone in the same way, regardless of what they do or how |
41 |
long they have been here? If you are not going to do that, spend your |
42 |
time on fixing bugs and writing code and let this drop before you waste |
43 |
time on it. There won't be any point in going further. |
44 |
|
45 |
No, I don't want to moderate -dev. I don't read most things, just the |
46 |
stuff that as a user I want to see coming around the corner, /usr and |
47 |
init* and such as that. I already help on two sites as it is. |
48 |
|
49 |
Dale |
50 |
|
51 |
:-) |
52 |
|
53 |
-- |
54 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
55 |
how you interpreted my words! |