| 1 |
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Right, anyone can nominate. However, if someone is nominating everyone |
| 3 |
> who is eligible (with the exception of one developer), then I would |
| 4 |
> see this as a clear abuse of the rule. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
The rule is very simple: anyone can nominate anyone. There are no |
| 7 |
implicit or explicit limits. There is nothing to be abused here, |
| 8 |
that's what's clear. You're just trying to blow this out of |
| 9 |
proportion. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
There are only two sane ways to deal with such an email. Either you |
| 12 |
consider this is the deed of an immature prankster and you just ignore |
| 13 |
it. Or you consider that, in some way, it is an unexpected improvement |
| 14 |
to the democratic process of our council elections, giving a chance to |
| 15 |
some quiet developers who wouldn't dare nominating themselves and who |
| 16 |
also don't bombard the mailing lists in order to occupy the media |
| 17 |
space. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
In any case, this kind of knee jerk reaction is not appropriate. Nor |
| 20 |
is a comrel bug. I was expecting much better from such an experienced |
| 21 |
developer as you, and a current council member on top of that. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Denis. |
Archives