| 1 |
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 4:43 PM Paweł Hajdan, Jr. <phajdan.jr@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 02/05/2018 22:32, Raymond Jennings wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Could I suggest a casual audit/overview of the workload of the |
| 6 |
> > games@g.o alias? |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > * commit rate to ebuilds in the games categories |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> Side suggestion: consider being more direct about the goal of your |
| 11 |
> inquiry. Is there some issue, such as the team being unresponsive or |
| 12 |
> inactive? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Keep in mind that you don't have to be on the games@g.o alias to commit to |
| 16 |
ebuilds in the games categories, so I'm not sure I'd tie the two together, |
| 17 |
unless the concern is specifically with games ONLY maintained by the games |
| 18 |
project, and not games in general. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Honestly though, I'm sure the "audit" would show the same thing an audit of |
| 21 |
any category will show - there is more demand than supply. :) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Rich |
Archives