Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: council members and appeals
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:10:18
Message-Id: 20180212161007.7tvzhwovrkmdzrmz@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: council members and appeals by Daniel Robbins
1 On 18-02-12 08:53:24, Daniel Robbins wrote:
2 > How about if they just abstain from any votes where there may be a conflict
3 > of interest? I would hate to limit the ability of people to contribute
4 > technically just because they were elected to council.
5 >
6 > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 3:42 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote:
7 >
8 > > Hi all,
9 > >
10 > > The council can't make this change since it is a glep 39 change, so I am
11 > > bringing it to the community for discussion -- I assume there would need
12 > > to be a full dev vote to make it happen.
13 > >
14 > > I feel that council members should not be members of projects whose
15 > > actions can be appealed to the council like qa or comrel. I have felt
16 > > this way for a long time, because I think it compromises the full
17 > > council's ability to vote fairly on appeals.
18 > >
19 > > As a member of the council who would be affected by this, if it passes
20 > > and I run and am elected to council again, I would have no problem with
21 > > stepping down from QA.
22 > >
23 > > Attached is a patch for glep 39 which will make this change.
24 > >
25 > > Thoughts?
26 > >
27
28 I've thought a similiar thing, if we go this route we also need to
29 ensure that a managed group does not obtain over 50% of the council
30 seats as that mean they can't vote if they all obstain.
31
32 --
33 Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature