1 |
How about if they just abstain from any votes where there may be a conflict |
2 |
of interest? I would hate to limit the ability of people to contribute |
3 |
technically just because they were elected to council. |
4 |
|
5 |
-Daniel |
6 |
|
7 |
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 3:42 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
|
9 |
> Hi all, |
10 |
> |
11 |
> The council can't make this change since it is a glep 39 change, so I am |
12 |
> bringing it to the community for discussion -- I assume there would need |
13 |
> to be a full dev vote to make it happen. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I feel that council members should not be members of projects whose |
16 |
> actions can be appealed to the council like qa or comrel. I have felt |
17 |
> this way for a long time, because I think it compromises the full |
18 |
> council's ability to vote fairly on appeals. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> As a member of the council who would be affected by this, if it passes |
21 |
> and I run and am elected to council again, I would have no problem with |
22 |
> stepping down from QA. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Attached is a patch for glep 39 which will make this change. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Thoughts? |
27 |
> |
28 |
> William |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |