1 |
On 18-09-06 14:37:07, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 2:02 PM Yury German <blueknight@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > What prevents us from running an Official binhost? Do we really need Foundation approval (nothing against Foundation). |
5 |
> > It would just be forming an official project would’t it? |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Coordinating with infra probably wouldn't hurt, but per GLEP 39: |
9 |
> "Any dev may create a new project just by creating a new project page |
10 |
> on the wiki.gentoo.org (see [2]) and sending a Request For Comments |
11 |
> (RFC) e-mail to gentoo-dev. Note that this GLEP does not provide for a |
12 |
> way for the community at large to block a new project, even if the |
13 |
> comments are wholly negative." |
14 |
> |
15 |
> So, kick it off. You could host it on anything really to start. |
16 |
> Honestly, I think that is a good model anyway - try to make it |
17 |
> something infra could accept, but with hosting being more of a |
18 |
> commodity these days it might make more sense to just let devs do |
19 |
> their thing and then centralize it later. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Now, if you lack the necessary hardware and want somebody else to pay |
22 |
> for it all, that would require Foundation approval, assuming you want |
23 |
> them to do the paying. The conditions on that are up to the trustees, |
24 |
> but I'd hope that they would require coordination with infra so that |
25 |
> we're not just handing out free servers... |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
Yep, the main reason I suggest infra's involvement at all is the compute |
29 |
resources required along with mirroring. Other than that anyone can do |
30 |
it (I could publish my binhost stuff I do internally). |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |