Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms

[Kristian Fiskerstrand]

On 11/13/2016 02:25 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 13/11/16 01:22, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 11/13/2016 02:21 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
>>> On Friday, November 11, 2016 7:22:19 PM EST Rich Freeman wrote:
>>>> That really reeks of micromanagement to me.  We don't have Council
>>>> approve individual appointments in any team currently, and the Comrel
>>>> lead already has the power to add/remove anybody from the team as
>>>> needed.
>>> No other project in Gentoo is controlled like that. Any developer can join any
>>> team without approval. It is not right that Comrel get's to choose who gets to
>>> be part of Comrel. Also that Comrel can remove members from that team/project.
>>>
>> " The QA team lead must approve developers who would like to join the
>> project. The applicant must demonstrate a thorough understanding of the
>> duties he would like to perform. By accepting the applicant the QA team
>> lead will accept the responsibility to direct them as part of the team
>> and will be held responsible for any action the team member takes on
>> behalf of the QA team."
>>
>>
> ^^ This sounds like a perfectly workable equivalent that could be
> applied to Comrel .. thoughts??
>

This is the current practice of being invited into comrel, but yes, if a
GLEP is written up for comrel (which I personally believe it should, as
for any special project, including the security project glep being
drafted) it is a natural part of it..

-- 
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3