| 1 |
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:08 AM Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> So what is the tl;dr of this? We stay with the complete chain of s-o-b |
| 4 |
> lines, but keep the strict real name requirement only for the final |
| 5 |
> committer? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
That is my sense of it (which I spelled out a bit more in my prior |
| 9 |
email), but I really don't have a strong opinion on the real name for |
| 10 |
outside contributors. Having it reduces risk, but I'm not sure it |
| 11 |
makes sense considering the type of org we are, and what we'd give up |
| 12 |
vs what we get. As others have said pseudonyms usually are legal and |
| 13 |
it isn't like we're checking passports even for the real names. I'm |
| 14 |
not sure if we have any numbers on how many are impacted, but I'm |
| 15 |
sympathetic. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I guess we could always ask people to at least use the real-name |
| 18 |
generator instead of the scifi-name generator to come up with them, if |
| 19 |
Rachael Lincoln sounds better than CommanderSkyshadow328. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Rich |
Archives