| 1 |
2013/5/24 Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I like what Tomáš proposed and I am in favor of the new CoC. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I also believe the council should not try to enforce the CoC. This is |
| 7 |
> something for devrel/userrel to do. The council should be the judge if |
| 8 |
> someone disagrees with |
| 9 |
> what devrel/userrel decided so he/she can appeal to another authority. |
| 10 |
> But for the day-to-day conflicts, I see no reason for the Council to |
| 11 |
> get involved. Imho this will |
| 12 |
> introduce another layer of bureaucracy without good reasons. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I think you just wrongly understood what Rich ment with the council. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
It was more about situation where member is in both in council and devrel, |
| 17 |
where he should not be at first decision and only be in appealing organ |
| 18 |
(council). |
| 19 |
But if other guys from council think it is no biggie we can drop the |
| 20 |
sentence. I am really indiferent about it. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Tom |
Archives