| 1 |
On 24 May 2013 14:46, Rich Freeman <rich@××××××××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I'm not a fan of having confused lines of authority where everybody is |
| 5 |
> in charge and as a result things get deadlocked. I'm all for having |
| 6 |
> delegated authority and collaboration, and I don't want the highest |
| 7 |
> authority to step in on every decision. However, I don't think the |
| 8 |
> authority of the council should be limited in any way as it concerns |
| 9 |
> the governance of the non-legal aspects of Gentoo, except that they |
| 10 |
> stand for election. That is their mandate. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> But, others feel differently, and as I said if the council doesn't |
| 13 |
> object to curtailing their authority, then I'll defer to them. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Rich |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I like what Tomáš proposed and I am in favor of the new CoC. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I also believe the council should not try to enforce the CoC. This is |
| 21 |
something for devrel/userrel to do. The council should be the judge if |
| 22 |
someone disagrees with |
| 23 |
what devrel/userrel decided so he/she can appeal to another authority. |
| 24 |
But for the day-to-day conflicts, I see no reason for the Council to |
| 25 |
get involved. Imho this will |
| 26 |
introduce another layer of bureaucracy without good reasons. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Regards, |
| 30 |
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 31 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang |
Archives