1 |
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> Thats a question, someone could correctly state that appealing mechanism |
3 |
> member should not be involved in the first level resolution. |
4 |
|
5 |
They could state that. There isn't anything "correct" or "incorrect" |
6 |
about that statement as it is a statement of values, not fact. |
7 |
|
8 |
The fact is that if the council is the judge then you don't have |
9 |
anyone to appeal it to. Whether that is a good thing or a bad thing |
10 |
is a matter of opinion. I'm of the opinion that it is neither good or |
11 |
bad. If the council doesn't like you they can just appoint an |
12 |
enforcer who will bring charges against you and then uphold them on |
13 |
appeal. If the community can't elect a decent group to govern it from |
14 |
within its ranks, then it is basically doomed no matter what the |
15 |
policies are. |
16 |
|
17 |
> Because this way it can be that you actually complain about decision of a |
18 |
> guy to the same guy. |
19 |
|
20 |
Yup. I agree that this would be a consequence of changing the policy. |
21 |
I think a unitary system of government makes sense for organizations |
22 |
smaller than a few million people, and a unitary government is one in |
23 |
which the topmost authority has absolute authority (though they can be |
24 |
elected, and can be a board). That is how most companies and even how |
25 |
most democracies work (the US being a noteworthy exception). The |
26 |
routine process may be to appeal to your local zoning board before |
27 |
going to parliament, but if for whatever reason your parliament was |
28 |
interested they could tell the zoning board to take a hike before they |
29 |
even make a ruling. In general this doesn't happen because |
30 |
responsible boards don't micro-manage, and I fully support that as |
31 |
well. |
32 |
|
33 |
I'm not a fan of having confused lines of authority where everybody is |
34 |
in charge and as a result things get deadlocked. I'm all for having |
35 |
delegated authority and collaboration, and I don't want the highest |
36 |
authority to step in on every decision. However, I don't think the |
37 |
authority of the council should be limited in any way as it concerns |
38 |
the governance of the non-legal aspects of Gentoo, except that they |
39 |
stand for election. That is their mandate. |
40 |
|
41 |
But, others feel differently, and as I said if the council doesn't |
42 |
object to curtailing their authority, then I'll defer to them. |
43 |
|
44 |
Rich |