| 1 |
2013/5/24 Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > I would like to hear all kind of suggestions for wording in the |
| 6 |
> document. I |
| 7 |
> > tried my best but I suck at expressing myself so please do your best. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I'd recommend dropping the last sentence about council members not |
| 10 |
> being enforcers, because this is not really a conflict of interest. |
| 11 |
> The council is the elected body in charge of non-legal aspects of the |
| 12 |
> community - devrel exists and serves at its pleasure. If we can't |
| 13 |
> trust the council to act responsibly, then there is really nothing |
| 14 |
> that we can do to keep the project running well. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Hi, |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Thats a question, someone could correctly state that appealing mechanism |
| 20 |
member should not be involved in the first level resolution. |
| 21 |
Because this way it can be that you actually complain about decision of a |
| 22 |
guy to the same guy. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Thats why I think that council should be taken out from making the first |
| 25 |
decision. But it does not mean that they can't give out suggestions for |
| 26 |
resolutions, they just should not be the one who effectively make it. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Cheers |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Tom |
Archives