1 |
Hey klondike, |
2 |
|
3 |
I am looking at the social contract and the only place that |
4 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o is in the introductory paragraph: |
5 |
|
6 |
"This social contract is intended to clearly describe the overall |
7 |
development policies and standards of the Gentoo project development team. |
8 |
Parts of this document have been derived from the Debian Social Contract. |
9 |
It is generally very similar to it except that certain parts have been |
10 |
clarified and augmented while other parts deemed redundant have been |
11 |
removed. Comments are welcome. Please send them to our |
12 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list." |
13 |
|
14 |
It's not actually in the social contract itself. |
15 |
|
16 |
At one point, maybe these last three sentences of the intro paragraph were |
17 |
appropriate, like when the social contract was a new thing and more of a |
18 |
work in progress. |
19 |
|
20 |
I would recommend the following changes. Replace the last three sentences |
21 |
of the introductory paragraph with something similar to the following: |
22 |
|
23 |
"Potential improvements to the social contract should be submitted to the |
24 |
Gentoo Linux bug tracker at https://bugs.funtoo.org, and assigned to |
25 |
gentoo-trustees. Specific questions about social contract, and discussion |
26 |
about potential future improvements can be posted to the gentoo-project |
27 |
mailing list." |
28 |
|
29 |
This is fair. First, it removes an attribution to Debian. I think our |
30 |
social contract has evolved to the point where it's now its own thing? |
31 |
(Maybe I'm wrong on this point) And it tightens up the wording to make it |
32 |
clear that our social contract is not in a "hey -- tell us what you think" |
33 |
stage. And yet we do have a clear process for formal changes (bug tracker) |
34 |
and general discussion and questions (gentoo-project). |
35 |
|
36 |
-Daniel |
37 |
|
38 |
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) < |
39 |
klondike@g.o> wrote: |
40 |
|
41 |
> Dear Gentoo Council, |
42 |
> |
43 |
> During the meeting you held on December (see the logs here: |
44 |
> https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20171210.txt ), you |
45 |
> voted for restricting the gentoo-dev mailing list. Although in said meeting |
46 |
> somebody raised that such a change affected the Gentoo Social Contract as |
47 |
> it referred users to provide comments on the gentoo-dev mailing list (see |
48 |
> https://www.gentoo.org/get-started/philosophy/social-contract.html ) this |
49 |
> was dismissed by one of your members (which has, in the past, called the |
50 |
> Gentoo Social Contract "dead law") by saying that the right place to send |
51 |
> such comments is gentoo-project (but willingly ignoring that such a |
52 |
> reference has been part of it since the first archived draft version |
53 |
> https://web.archive.org/web/20021112053724/http://www. |
54 |
> gentoo.org:80/main/en/contract.xml and the first non draft version |
55 |
> https://web.archive.org/web/20031203222653/http://www. |
56 |
> gentoo.org:80/main/en/contract.xml which predate the gentoo-project |
57 |
> mailing list) and apparently ignored by the rest. |
58 |
> |
59 |
> This was noted after the vote had happened and to the best of my knowledge |
60 |
> hadn't been raised before. Despite that, on the next meeting where the |
61 |
> topic was discussed a different council member stated that said person did |
62 |
> not "any pertinent new information since last vote". |
63 |
> |
64 |
> Now, three months after, no action has been carried by the council on this |
65 |
> very specific regard despite being made aware of it. This clearly shows |
66 |
> that the current council members not only take hastened decissions without |
67 |
> even doing propper research, they don't try to clean up the mess they cause |
68 |
> after their own decissions. |
69 |
> |
70 |
> Given the inaction by the council, I'm propossing to apply either of these |
71 |
> two changes to the Gentoo Social contract. |
72 |
> |
73 |
> First propossal: |
74 |
> Replace "Comments are welcome. Please send them to our |
75 |
> gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list." by "Comments by selected |
76 |
> people are welcome. Please send them to our gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
77 |
> mailing list.". Which clearly reflects the new ivory tower philosophy the |
78 |
> Council is making the Gentoo Project take. |
79 |
> |
80 |
> Second propossal: |
81 |
> Replace "Comments are welcome. Please send them to our |
82 |
> gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list." by "Comments by selected |
83 |
> people are welcome. Please send them to our gentoo-project@lists. |
84 |
> gentoo.org mailing list CCing the Gentoo Foundation trustees on |
85 |
> trustees@l.g.o.". Which ensures trustees get a notification of |
86 |
> such propossals and still keeps the social contract open to comments for |
87 |
> anybody. |
88 |
> |
89 |
> Please note, in the spirit of the second propossal I'm CCing |
90 |
> gentoo-project. |
91 |
> |
92 |
> Klondike |
93 |
> |