Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: arches.desc & GLEP 72 (was: Re: [gentoo-project] Items for Council Agenda, May 14)
Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 15:38:51
Message-Id: 2842831.0K8phAlnt4@pinacolada
In Reply to: Re: arches.desc & GLEP 72 (was: Re: [gentoo-project] Items for Council Agenda, May 14) by Roy Bamford
1 Am Sonntag, 7. Mai 2017, 17:47:52 CEST schrieb Roy Bamford:
2 > I don't like the reuse of terms like stable, testing, and so on but
3 > I'm not first to point that out.
4
5 Semi-fixed...
6
7 > I can see downsides to that too because trasitions will be in both
8 > directions. e.g. arm64 is heading toward stable from the unknown,
9 > and x86 will soon be going in the other direction.
10
11 I don't understand where the downside in your opinion is.
12
13 > "testing" for all architectures where "inofficial" "inofficial" ->
14 > "unofficial"
15
16 Done
17
18 > specified for an architecture. This is the current behaviour and shall be
19 > the default if nothing is specified in arches.desc for an architecture.
20
21 Done
22
23 https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Dilfridge/GLEP:72
24
25 --
26 Andreas K. Hüttel
27 dilfridge@g.o
28 Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature