| 1 |
On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 09:05:12 -0800 |
| 2 |
Nick Vinson <nvinson234@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 11/11/2016 04:22 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> |
| 7 |
> >> This is all about perceptions, not processes. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Great. Whose perception needs changing? Besides the ~5 people |
| 10 |
> > replying in this list? |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> >> |
| 13 |
> >> Why just have the comrel lead approved by Council why not all comrel |
| 14 |
> >> appointments? |
| 15 |
> >> |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > That really reeks of micromanagement to me. We don't have Council |
| 18 |
> > approve individual appointments in any team currently, and the Comrel |
| 19 |
> > lead already has the power to add/remove anybody from the team as |
| 20 |
> > needed. |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Do you honestly see comrel as being no different than any other project? |
| 24 |
> To my knowledge, no other project has the power to dismiss developers |
| 25 |
> or issue punitive measures. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
QA lead actually has that power as well. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Best regards, |
| 31 |
Michał Górny |
| 32 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives