| 1 |
05.02.2015 09:56, Michał Górny пишет: |
| 2 |
> 1. remove or reduce the ebuild quiz to a reasonable number of |
| 3 |
> questions. In other words, make it bearable. Focus on the stuff that |
| 4 |
> can't be checked otherwise. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> 2. Add an extra contribution period in which the candidate commits to |
| 7 |
> the tree through Pull Requests. Developers watch the requests, review |
| 8 |
> them and decide when the recruit is ready. We may extend this with |
| 9 |
> requirements like '3 different developers must review late activities |
| 10 |
> and evaluate them'. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> 3. Possibly extend the recruit-recruiter interaction. Rather than |
| 13 |
> treating the interrogation as some kind of final confirmation, make it |
| 14 |
> a small extra part of the learning process. In other words, reduce |
| 15 |
> the other parts, fill in the blanks here. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> What do you think? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
regarding 1 - Please do not. We have issue with recruits that do not |
| 21 |
understand quizes well and then commit things, that should never ever |
| 22 |
happened. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
regarding 2 - As i know we usually have such things, but they are not |
| 25 |
some kind of policy, just a common sense, which recruiters use to make |
| 26 |
sure that recruit is well-trained and can do good stuff. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
regarding 3 - This is clearly mentor's responsibility in my POV |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Best regards, Sergey Popov |
| 32 |
Gentoo developer |
| 33 |
Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead |
| 34 |
Gentoo Quality Assurance project lead |
| 35 |
Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead |
Archives