| 1 |
I think it is unfortunate that you chose silence as your platform, |
| 2 |
Richard. In an election with so many options, expecting people to ask you |
| 3 |
why you stood means you want others to do work just to get to know your |
| 4 |
option. That is neither fair nor scalable. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
The result represents that. If you do something or want something, please |
| 7 |
understand that it is your job to do express yourself, not the community's |
| 8 |
job to pull from you. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Unspoken expectations are most likely to lead to disappointment, I suppose |
| 11 |
:) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Cheers, |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Seemant |
| 16 |
On Jul 17, 2014 7:28 AM, "Richard Yao" <ryao@g.o> wrote: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> > On Jul 17, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> |
| 20 |
> wrote: |
| 21 |
> > For what's it worth, I couldn't care less if my voting is public or not, |
| 22 |
> > it's nothing personal to anyone, it's only what I think is best for the |
| 23 |
> > distribution |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > And I hope others feel the same way (even those whom didn't get elected) |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> I admit that I had some initial negative feelings when I saw that the only |
| 29 |
> less popular option than myself was reopening nominations, but I got over |
| 30 |
> it after realizing that people's opinions were none of my business. I had |
| 31 |
> refrained from making unsolicited statements on my positions in the belief |
| 32 |
> that someone should ask first, but none did. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> I think that is unfortunate that no one asked and that the outcome might |
| 35 |
> have been different had a single person asked, but c'est la vie. I bear no |
| 36 |
> ill will toward anyone who cast a vote (or did not cast a vote). How people |
| 37 |
> voted should have no bearing on the interactions between those voting and |
| 38 |
> those on the ballot. |
| 39 |
> |
Archives