| 1 |
On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 17:22:03 +0200 Toralf Förster wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> after a talk at IRC I started to broaden the scope of the tinderbox [1] |
| 6 |
> by adding FEATURES=test . |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> A lot of findings did appear immediately. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> That's why now only the packages defined in [2] (requested at IRC by |
| 11 |
> gentoo devs) will have that feature aktivated. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Over the time I do plan to add more categories - will see, how it is |
| 14 |
> going on. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> If you like seeing your package categories in [2] - just drop me a |
| 17 |
> message in IRC. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> And ofc "notest" is a valid decision too - just ping me for that too. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> [1] https://zwiebeltoralf.de/tinderbox.html |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> [2] https://github.com/toralf/tinderbox/blob/master/data/package.env.common |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> sci-*/* test |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Oh my, this will be an utter pain... Sci software is often of bad |
| 30 |
quality in terms of code quality and tests are even worse. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Some time ago I fixed tests for pythia. It took me 10x more time |
| 33 |
than for work over all other issues. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Best regards, |
| 36 |
Andrew Savchenko |
Archives