| 1 |
On 10/30/2012 03:11 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ciaran McCreesh schrieb: |
| 3 |
>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:06:30 +0100 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 4 |
>> <chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> The reason why I think that < dependencies are not bad is that |
| 6 |
>>> existing users of such packages will typically simply miss out |
| 7 |
>>> on upgrades. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>> No, what will happen is that Portage will perform the upgrades |
| 10 |
>> anyway and break things, since it doesn't check dependencies of |
| 11 |
>> installed packages that aren't part of the resolution. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Do you have a test case for this? I haven't observed this in recent times. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
It should not be an issue since portage-2.1.10.21, which had the |
| 16 |
--complete-graph-if-new-ver enabled by default: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=2733ea17d8e25db8dd369e8890337ddb553e2509 |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Thanks, |
| 21 |
Zac |
Archives