| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Ciaran McCreesh schrieb: |
| 5 |
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:06:30 +0100 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 6 |
> <chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> The reason why I think that < dependencies are not bad is that |
| 8 |
>> existing users of such packages will typically simply miss out |
| 9 |
>> on upgrades. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> No, what will happen is that Portage will perform the upgrades |
| 12 |
> anyway and break things, since it doesn't check dependencies of |
| 13 |
> installed packages that aren't part of the resolution. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Do you have a test case for this? I haven't observed this in recent times. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Best regards, |
| 19 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 21 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 22 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iEYEARECAAYFAlCQUKEACgkQ+gvH2voEPRCa7ACeJoJU+OVcYlsqHNbdlZzWj6KW |
| 25 |
vfsAn0fDzGzs/PSCZ74jgijdOezJ/UZg |
| 26 |
=pkHx |
| 27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives